“But let justice
roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream.” Amos 5.24
I remember when I was a student, and noticed this verse
for the first time. It helped me realise that God’s Word was not just
spiritual, but also political. It also revealed the nature of the prophetic
calling, the means whereby God warns his people of impending judgment for their
injustice (3.7-8).
Naturally, the ruling class never wants to hear this word
of Divine correction, so prophecy is frequently forbidden (2.11-12). But God
challenged prophecy’s domestication by a caste of professional prophets, through
calling this ex-shepherd (7.14-16).
Amos condemned the exploitation of the poor: through
taxation, expropriation, and corruption in the courts (5.11-15); while the rich
sought more profits (8.5-6). With an increasing class divide, the wealthy became
addicted (4.1), constructed expensive houses (3.15), and enjoyed luxurious
lifestyles (6.4-6).
As the gap between rich and poor increases today, this
word is ever more relevant. A sensual materialistic lifestyle, based on the
oppression of the poor, characterises our society today. But this is not just a
left-wing message. Domination also shaped the sexual exploitation of the
powerless (2.3), as it does today. The sin of the nation combined all sins in a single
movement of departure from the covenant, which God had established with his
people, and which he sent his prophets to call them back to.
So, Amos laid into
their compromised syncretistic religion based on the shrines at Bethel and
Gilgal (3.14; 4.4; 5.5), as well as their importation of foreign astrological
deities (5.26). In particular, however, he criticised their infatuation with superficial
worship: singing and lyres (guitars?), which ignored justice; a relevant word
for our contemporary worship industry?
But when we look at Amos’s words to the nations (1-3), we
see their judgment was based on standards of common natural justice. Condemnation
of specifically ‘religious’ sin was reserved for those who should have known
better, because they were party to the covenant. No country today has a
covenant with God. There is no chosen nation. We cannot expect governments to
promote faith. To do so is always a mistake, and a sell-out to power.
Easy-going Christians today may recoil from the language
of judgement, reacting against the fulminations of fundamentalist preachers. But
judgment is real; and the Day of the Lord, is not just at the end-times, but occurs
within history (5.18-20).
Where the Hebrew Scriptures, portray a unitary
Nation-Church, however, the New Testament, distinguishes them. The State is
evaluated by how it treats the most marginalised; the Church by its fidelity to
the covenant, including true worship, but also commitment to social justice.
The judgment proclaimed by Amos included famine, but far
worse would be God’s withdrawal from the lives of his people, a famine of the
Word of God itself (8.11). Do we not live in such times today? And yet, the
book ends with hope. True worship would be restored, and the gentile nations
themselves, included in God’s people (9.11-12).
No comments:
Post a Comment