I’ve recently got into the music of
Samuel Lane, a worship leader from the Vineyard churches, well-known for their
tradition of intimate worship music. His songs are beautiful evocations of
praise to God, which draw me in, and help refresh my relationship with Christ.
Some appropriate for corporate settings,
others suitable as performed songs of personal experience, they have,
nevertheless, been very helpful in renewing my faith during recent times of
dryness. As expressions of spiritual devotion, they are basically love songs to
Jesus; very reminiscent of Matt Redman’s songs, though perhaps more
passionately delivered. And I need that energy.
As such, though, they also fall victim
to the frequent criticism, of being ‘Jesus is my boyfriend’ songs. The thought
goes that songs in this genre are lyrically weak and over-sentimental. Indeed
many are. They are bereft of profound theological content, and continue the
usual evangelical weakness, of ignoring kingdom issues of justice and
liberation.
But I think there is also a discomfort
about the use of emotion in worship, and particularly the idea of men singing
love songs to another man. The development is often blamed therefore for the
absence of men from Christian church services. We need, it is claimed, more
‘manly’ worship.
Perhaps that is true. But I think the
reaction is also a symptom of a deep dis-ease with emotions and feelings as
such. This reflects hetero-sexual male discomfort with the expression of
emotion, ill-at-ease especially with the homo-erotic overtones of love between
men.
Perhaps we need a deep healing in our
psyches, to own our own emotional lives. Obviously worship is more than
emotion, but must not be less than emotion. Our praise to God should include
our whole being: including emotion, will, and intellect. The expression of
intimate love for Jesus is after all not a twentieth century invention.
Look at nineteenth century pietist hymns
of devotion, in both protestant and catholic churches. Some of it was certainly
cloying in its sentimentality, and justifiably died out. But it did articulate
heart worship: for them, at that time, in that culture. And who would say that
much contemporary worship music will necessarily last beyond our period?
Furthermore, the use of sexual love as
an analogy for spirituality, is an authentic part of the Christian mystical
tradition: for example, the Englishman Richard Rollo, and the Spaniard St. John
of the Cross. Even Meister Eckhart’s language of self-annihilation was more like
the ego-loss of sexual ecstasy than the eastern experience of nirvana.
Even more, is the example within
Scripture, of the Song of Songs.
Rightly, scholars have criticised the church for allegorising this as about our
relationship with God. But although the church’s Neo-platonic discomfort with
sex and the body was responsible for this in the past, there is now an opposing
discomfort with seeing our spiritual life in such erotic ways.
So Jesus is my more-than-boyfriend, not
less than that. We need to break through into the encounter with the living
God: always present, seldom felt.
No comments:
Post a Comment